Rabu, 31 Maret 2010

Love Never Dies - Climb Aboard the Ferris Wheel

It's been quite some time since I've dissected anything about the Phantom of the Opera. As most of you know, I've picked, poked, and prodded at the original until I've squeezed every ounce of life from the story from Leroux to Webber. Now, I have a new psychological playground in which to have fun and will start to post very soon. I've climbed into the sandbox and fiddled around a bit already thinking about all the buried gems I can dig up for us to enjoy.

In the sequel, we get to re-visit our favorites - the Phantom, Christine, Raoul, Madame Giry, and Meg, and meet some newbies - Gustav, freaks and bathing beauties! While we're at it, let's talk about the many emotions and motivations in this heartwrenching story that make it so powerful - passion, seduction, jealousy, love, obsessiveness, bitterness, regrets, and the need to be seen.

There's one change this time. Your view will not be from Box 5. We're no longer in the Opera House folks, we're on Coney Island. I encourage you to take a ride on the ferris wheel of discovery instead. Climb aboard, take a seat, and go around in circles as we view what lessons can be found in ALW's newest Phantom creation. You can be assured, I will do the same as before - take you to a place of thought and reflection so you can discover how this story speaks to your heart.

My first post will be about the Phantom. What's happened to him in Love Never Dies? Does he wear the same mask and wig? Is he still deformed and partially bald? What about his personality? Has he turned into a mellow Mr. Y or is he still the obsessive recluse monster with a tendency to strangle? Does he live above or beneath the world? Does anybody care? I'm sure Mister Y (who is a mystery) would like you to find out!

Tune in for future posts, as soon as my muse starts to whisper in my ear, I'll be back!

Cheerfully yours,
The Phantom's Student

PS...I hope he reads this, because I really want him to notice me. ;-)

Kamis, 25 Maret 2010

Love Never Dies Review - Embrace, Enjoy or Reject

Wednesday, March 24, I had the privilege of seeing Love Never Dies in London. I know my readers have been anxious to hear what I have to say, so I thought I'd write my thoughts before my show, All Things Phantom, on April 3, 2010 on BlogTalkRadio.

SPOILER ALERT
Beware if you don't wish to know what happens, don't read.


Introduc
tion

So where do I start? Well, it was a Wednesday night at the Adelphi Theatre, a packed house, filled with an anxious audience who gobbled up the programs (that's "programme" for the British, by the way) and LND booklet, which was fabulous! Mine now contains Ramin Karimloo's autograph slightly smudged by the rain. Very nice guy, humble, kind, and unpretentious. Thanks to a friend showing me the way to the stage door after the performance, I met Ramin and Sierra Boggess.

The Scenes & Music

Okay, back to the nitty gritty. Packed house and the scene opens, somewhat reminiscent of how Phantom begins, with a look back in time through Madame Giry's eyes. I found the beginning a tad painful, somewhat difficult to hear the voice of the performer. Not sure why it made me feel uncomfortable. Perhaps I just wanted to get on with it! Then it goes into the Coney Island Waltz and you are transported back to heyday of the park. Terrific special effects keeps you entertained.

Let me talk about the CD versus the stage performance. I know many of you have been judging the show by the CD. All I can say is you are blind if you are judging Love Never Dies merely by the CD itself. The show is a visual experience and the songs are not sung like the professional recording. Take every number that Ramin and Sierra sings and add onto it the following: longing, heartache, agony, frustration, anger, regret, and love (plus many more emotions) and you have the music. That also includes Raoul's portrayal, which is quite good.

'Til I Hear You Sing was POWERFUL. The crowd cheered Ramin after the song. He puts such emotion into it that it grabs your heart. For all of you dying to know, Sierra plays the robotic mannequin but it's replaced by a real mannequin later on. It carries the same vein of the Phantom story. Look folks, the man is still obsessed with Christine...end of story. There are no sexual innuendos associated with the "robotic" look alike that was rumored beforehand. I want to squash that immediately. Somehow they do a quick switch and it's replaced with a real mannequin and Madame Giry pulls her arm off as she complains of the Phantom's obsession.

Well, one thing leads to another and he decides to lure Christine to Coney Island to sing for him and sends off a letter. Madame Giry doesn't quite understand why he can't get over her since she and Meg are the ones who took care of him the past 10 years causing roots of bitterness (it's a ploy for conflict in a plot - likable or not). The person who plays her is different than the CD. No heavy French accent. Voice is not so sharp and "mean" but rather laced with bitterness for having given her life in his service.

Three months later Raoul and Christine arrive. Let me say this, when Christine comes on stage, it takes your breath away! OMG the woman is gorgeous! I felt as obsessed as the Phantom seeing her again for the first time.

The next big memorable number is when the Phantom reveals himself to Christine. It surprised me, but she reacts with fear at first followed by anger. The song Beneath a Moonless Sky was emotionally charged. The audience around me was as mesmerized as I was by the two of them doing a choreograph of almost touching but never touching each other. It's a heartfelt passionate remorseful moment between the two.

Now, as far as the words in the song, here is where those who object to the storyline will not like it. I can only say if you never see the show, you'll miss an emotional, passionate reunion between Christine and the Phantom where finally she confesses her love and regret for her choice and he as well. How do I see it? When I re-read the verses of the Point of No Return, Beneath the Moonless Sky for me is the culmination of all their spoken desires finally expressed. The song Once Upon Another Time is quite good too, as Christine sings they must live with their choices.

Any comic relief? Not much in this heart-tugging, heart-wrenching musical. However, Dear Old Friend put smiles on the face of everyone around me. It was great!

Ah, The Beauty Underneath! A menagerie of the Phantom's domain. Eye-catching stage effects and watching the interaction between Gustav and the Phantom. (I want to shout symbolism here...you'll get it later folks.) Your foot taps along to this powerful number. The sad part? He thinks Gustav understands the beauty underneath, so the Phantom removes his wig and mask in front of him. Well, if you've listened to the CD, you know the child's reaction is one of horror where he sees no beauty. It's during this song, the Phantom realizes this could be his son.

Let's talk about Raoul. I know a lot of people say he's been made into a drunk and changed too drastically. Beneath it all lives a broken man. Joseph Millson was a brilliant Raoul. He really displays Raoul's frustrations well. His behavior sounds less harsh to me than portrayed on the CD, and his performance makes you pity him, rather than despise him as the drunk and gambler you think him to be. He's a man who drowns his pain in alcohol, as he realizes he is incapable of giving Christine everything she needs - music. (Gee, didn't we talk about that on All Things Phantom?)

Devil Take the Hindmost is the song the two of them sing together. The Phantom is menacing in this number and there is some physical altercation between the two. The two enemies have reunited. Two men out to win the heart of one woman. Interesting to note, the Phantom confronts him without a mask, but wig on. The end result, they make a bet between the two of them.

Beyond this point, emotions run high between these two men trying to influence Christine to sing or not to sing. And Christine? Fabulous! The torment of having to choose once again is powerfully portrayed by Sierra. Raoul makes his plea for her not to sing and return to Paris. He leaves, the Phantom enters, and he makes his plea for her to sing. It's here that he puts the necklace around her neck, and she reaches up and touches his mask (note: she did not do that the second time I saw it). She shivers and melts (if you can do two things at once), which reminded me of his powerful influence over her in the original.

There she is, on the stage, between two men, one on the right, the other on the left, both holding their hands out to poor conflicted Christine. She sings, unaware of the pack the two men have made. The anguish Sierra puts into Love Never Dies is amazing. The audience cheered and whistled after her performance.

Downhill from here? Well, it's different. Raoul leaves her because he's lost the bet, but also realizes it's the Phantom she really wants. Meg carries off Gustav to throw him in the ocean after her Bathing Beauty number throws her over the edge. They find her at the pier and she threatens suicide with a gun pointed at her head. The Phantom talks her out of it. In a fit of anger, after he speaks Christine's name, she shoots.

Christine lays dying in the Phantom's arms. Gustav is told the Phantom is his father. She begs for a last kiss, and he kisses her as she dies. The kiss is reminiscent of his reaction the first time - his body shuddering at the touch of her lips. The last kiss, the heartache, brings people to tears. However, the next part was what tore my heart to shreds.

A repentant Meg gathers Christine in her arms and hugs her. The Phantom stands distraught and broken over the loss and moves away from Christine's body to center stage.

Gustave approaches and looks at his father. Erik shrinks away as his hand comes toward his face wanting to remove his mask. At first, the Phantom resists, but then removes his mask and wig revealing his hideous appearance. He doesn't recoil, but looks at it and then takes his hand and lays it on top of his father's deformity, which once again brings Erik to that place you saw him at the end of Phantom of the Opera. The boy shows him acceptance and compassion, and in an emotional move embraces his father and buries his head in his chest as he sees the beauty underneath. The Phantom reacts by embracing his son in return and the curtain comes down.

Costumes & Sets

In a nutshell, the best costumes are on Christine. She's dressed in gorgeous period dresses. The others are simple period clothing.

The sets are simple, but effective. There is often use of a circular movement on stage of the set where it turns. The one used during Devil Take the Hindmost (Quartet) is quite effective. Raoul is at one end in the wings and the Phantom at the other, with Christine standing on stage in between agonizing over whether to sing or not. You'll see a lot of bare stage in this production. There are not lavish colorful sets like in the original Phantom of the Opera. However, there are special effects on screening that are unique and amazing.

Performances

Ramin is the Phantom incarnate, as far as I'm concerned. His portrayal of that character is wonderful. Sierra was breathtakingly beautiful. Her performance as Christine was perfection. It's her performance that really grabs your heart and won't let go. She really has the profoundest effect upon the audience, as you share her agony over being placed in that position once more of making a choice.

Joseph, who plays Raoul, does a phenomenal job of playing a character who has been changed. You genuinely feel his regrets. There are six different children that rotate playing Gustav. Charlie Manton played the first night and did very good. Liz Robertson, as Madame Giry, and Summer Strallen, as Meg, is the character that you'll find changed the most. Their performances were good.

Audience Reaction

It was a packed house, even midweek. What did I hear around me? At times I could have heard a pin drop in the audience. It was like every cough was suppressed and every breath held during some scenes. Women cried (can't vouch for any men though). The show ended, there were cheers and whistles and standing ovations. The Phantom comes out in his deformed state unmasked to take his bows. The lights came up, and some stood staring at the stage and didn't leave until the last note was played by the orchestra and then they cheered and clapped again. I spoke with the family next to me and they loved it. Made it to the stage door, and those I spoke with loved it too. I'm sure others don't, as Tuesday when I got there I met a British couple walking out the door during intermission and leaving early saying they hated the music.

What did I think as a show?

If you want me to "grade" it, I'll give it a "B" overall. Performances and music between the Phantom, Christine, and Raoul were fantastic. For those fans who vow never to see it based on the storyline, I can only say you'll miss the wonderful interaction between the characters torn with regret and motivated by love, jealousy, and obsession. It's worth the price of the ticket to watch the interaction between Christine, the Phantom, and Raoul.

The storyline is different, but it's a plot, formed with conflict, to move it to an end. The story of compassion and acceptance rests on Gustuv's shoulders this time. It is he that must look beyond the deformity to accept his father and find the beauty underneath. Though Christine dies at the end, I have to ask myself a hard question. Did either of them really deserve her? I guess you'll have to answer that for yourself too.

If you dislike the change in Madame Giry and Meg, then you'll not like the play. Madame Giry is very much like the stern sour-faced ballet mistress in the original. Same dress - same tone - only a woman turned bitter. It's the point of conflict of two people who have given their life to a man they love, who can't let go of his obsession with Christine. Do they have a right to be bitter? That's what you'll have to decided for yourself. Do people change in 10 years? Yes, of course, they do. Life circumstances changes all of us for the good or bad. Whether you'll allow that to happen to your favorite characters, is up to you as a fan.

The remaining scenes to me are "fillers" that push the story along. Most disappointing, of course, is Bathing Beauties and Meg's unveiling. Why does she do it? It's a ploy to get the Phantom to notice her, but when he's not at the performance, that very act is what pushes her over the edge of instability.

Necessary in the plot? Probably a poor choice that should be rewritten. Necessary on the stage? It was an uncomfortable moment that I wish I didn't have to watch. It's a staging where she takes off layers of bathing suits and in true burlesque style of the day comes out with two small umbrellas in front of her bare breasts while she sings. Then she turns around, removes the umbrellas, and you see her naked back. My seat was 4 rows back from the stage far left, and I had an angle of her chest but saw nothing. I do wish they'd rethink that portion of the show.

At this point, I can say I was entertained and enthralled by Ramin and Sierra. The story may not be your cup of tea, but I'm not as opposed to it as most. As a writer, plotting whether good or bad, needs conflict and something to move it along. The outcome is not perhaps what people would have liked to see, but I'll talk about that more in the future.

Is there a message still there? Absolutely! Still a powerful word that one must see the beauty underneath in each human and to look with your heart and not your eyes in judging others. It's Gustav this time that learns that lesson.

How will the show fair in the future? Well, if I go by the audience's reaction, I think it will do well worldwide, but it won't be the classic you fell in love with. For whatever reason Andrew Lloyd Webber felt motivated to do a sequel, he takes responsibility for its outcome. It's up to you now to decide what you wish to do with it. As for me, I'll see it two more times before I leave London and will take away what I learned from the story and share with my readers.

So did I embrace, enjoy, or reject? Put me in the enjoy category. I haven't embraced it as a classic like the original, but didn't reject it. The show is a visual, musical, emotional experience well worth seeing. If you shun it based on prejudice beforehand, then you'll miss the wonderful Phantom and Christine you've grown to love from the original.

One last warning, bring tissues if you do go. I tried very hard to suppress any tears, but they just poured out with a will of their own throughout the show here and there, not only during the emotional ending. Ramin is so powerful watching as the Phantom that it touches your soul - not just your mind. Each performance had the same effect upon me.

Join me on All Things Phantom April 3rd @ 5 p.m. PST for more information. I'll be there to answer any questions you have. It's hard to write about everything in a two hour show, so there is much more to share.

Sincerely,
The Phantom's Student

NOTE: The picture of Ramin Karimloo was taken by me outside the stage door after the performance and the others the day before outside the theater.


Senin, 22 Maret 2010

My Diabolical Plan Over Live Never Dies

This week I'll be seeing Love Never Dies on Wednesday and Friday evening. I thought I would post my thoughts beforehand, because I know there are many of my readers who want me to be their ears and eyes until it comes to the States. Even if you won’t be able to see it in New York in November, you’ll still have a bucketful of critic and fan responses to read in order to draw some conclusion, besides my own 2 cents.

I’ve pretty much worn out my CD of Love Never Dies, though I recently read a comment that the score has been altered somewhat due to changes in the show. Nevertheless, I get the gist of the story. It would be arrogant of me, however, to write about the production when I’ve never actually seen it with my own eyes. I’m not about to comment on anything about the stage play or characters until I’ve witnessed the show. It would be a bit presumptuous on my part.

When I began this journey thinking about seeing Love Never Dies and coming back to write about it, I was faced with a difficult choice – to be a people pleaser or not. I sometimes envision myself standing in front of a huge crowd of Phantom fans. On the right are those vehemently opposed to the sequel for a variety of reasons, whether they have seen it or not. To my left stands the supporters of the sequel for a variety of reasons, whether they have seen it or not. Of course, there is that mediocre crowd somewhere up in the balcony that have no feelings either way. (Smiles and waves)

As I look at that huge group of friends, readers, and fans on both sides, I can’t help but think if I please some, I’ll lose others. (I could play this selfishly you know, slyly analyzing which side will give me more books sales and smile at them the biggest.)

What side do I choose? Where do I stand where it’s safe and I don’t get hit with a rotten tomato for my thoughts? (People don’t hand out pennies for your thoughts anymore by the way.) Will both sides still like me, if I take a stance? But…but…I want everyone to like me! What a dilemma!

Right now, I’m like Erik. My mask is on. (Though, I think some of you already know which side of the dark side I’m leaning toward.) When I take the mask off, will you still love me in spite of my hideous posts that may follow that grate against your Phantom psyche? You know I love you anyway or at least I hope you do!

So here’s my diabolical plan. Upon my return, I’ll tell you exactly what I saw - the acting, songs, sets, costumes, audience reaction, and changes to the storyline I hear that differ from the original CD since its release. After that, hold onto your computers, as I start to blog about those characters that changed so drastically from the original Phantom of the Opera (as if none of us ever had a life experience that changed our personalities in the past 10 years).

As before, I will dissect the wonderful psychological playground that Andrew Lloyd Webber has set up to dabble in once again. We’ll talk about Christine, Erik, Raoul, Meg, and Gustav. What will we learn? What will we see? What speaks to your heart? What doesn't? Keep an open mind, and you might be surprised

As you stand before me now in one big mosh pit* of Phantom fans, I wave goodbye! I’m off to see Love Never Dies. Please behave while I’m gone. Try not to slam one another in a frenzy.

I must finish packing. My plane leaves is 7 hours, and I need to go breathe inside a paper bag to calm myself.

Cheerfully yours,
The Phantom’s Student

*Definition of Mosh Pit – “Moshing or slamming refers to the activity in which audience members at live music performances aggressively push or slam into each other!"

Boy does that fit! ( http://en.wikipedia.org)

Sabtu, 13 Maret 2010

Walk With Me



"Walk With Me"

(For Haiti Relief)





Kamis, 11 Maret 2010

Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber

Love Never Dies had its world premiere on March 10th. The firestorm about this new musical started long ago. You can read one of my previous posts regarding my own thoughts on his decision to do a sequel to the beloved Phantom of the Opera.

As I stated before, it's caused a disturbance in the lair. Before its release, it was lambasted across the Internet on a variety of forums by fans who vehemently opposed its release. Now it's being lambasted for the story by its critics but loved by others. In addition to the fans (phans) being quite vocal on their criticism, Andrew has retaliated himself with a few public comments over the judgmental blasting he's received from what he terms "obsessed" fans.

If there's anything I've learned in my two years surfing the Phantom community and being involved with its fans, is this story elicits deep passionate emotions from its followers. It was quite evident during my show, All Things Phantom, and it's still quite evident as I pen this post (for which I may get lambasted myself).

I'm not here to criticize or comment on whether Love Never Dies should have ever been released or whether it's good or bad. I've listened to the CD, had my thoughts, and will see it on March 26. My post is directed at its composer, Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber. Who is this man that has caused such a stir? Well, let's take a brief look at his career.
  • He has composed 13 musicals
  • He's won 6 Tony Awards (including 40 nominations)
  • He's won 3 Grammy Awards (including 60 nominations)
  • He's won an Academy Award (including 2 nominations)
  • He's won 7 Olivier Awards (including 100 nominations)
  • He's won a Golden Globe
  • And to top it off, the Queen of England saw fit to knight him in 1992 for his services to music
Now, after reading that impressive list this one human being has given to humanity during his lifetime, his public fans who have despised his release of Love Never Dies have saw fit to:
  • Accused him of penning the sequel because he's money hungry
  • Inferred he's insane or becoming senile in his elder years
  • Wished for his demise
  • Cursed him
  • And spoken ill about him in a thousand other ways
I think it's quite poignant some angry fans actually look like the lynch mob that came after Erik in the lair with their torches, ropes, and cries of "lets get him!" He's done something that has displeased us, so our response has been to publicly humiliate him on the Internet via Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, forums, boards, and groups.

Lately, he's been a bit upset over the public attacks. Should he be? I think he has a right to be because of the spirit in which the criticism has been launched. I can honestly understand the man's frustration. Is it because he can't take public criticism? The man has been a composer his entire life, in the entertainment industry, and criticized a thousand times over for his work. This is not the first time, but I think it's probably been the first time he's been so severely criticised by the medium of modern technology before his work ever hit the stage.

The playing field has changed since 1986 when he first released The Phantom of the Opera, which even then didn't get good reviews. The Internet back then didn't exist. Free speech wasn't so free and easy to get out. Times have changed. We instantly post what's on our mind and send it across the airwaves for millions to read. The Internet is a powerful medium for good or evil. We've become a society proficient at tearing apart our fellow human beings through the advent of technology.

Everyone has the right to like or dislike the story. It's the manner, however, in which we do so that I believe causes our beloved Phantom to raise a brow. You may be quite angry at Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber for tinkering with the story. However, the man deserves our basic respect for his contributions to the entertainment industry during his lifetime, even while voicing unhappy displeasure over Love Never Dies.

In all the negative fan comments I've read over his audacity of penning a sequel, not once have I seen among all the criticism a heartfelt thank you for bringing us the original that is being so vehemently defended. He immortalized your genius of music from Leroux into a musical, moved you with its haunting music, brought tears to your eyes with the story, and this is how some repay him.

I think it's time to step back and examine what's going on here. Love Never Dies may not be your cup of tea, but for others it will be. It just grieves me that others have seen fit to string him up with the Punjab lasso for following his own desire to continue the story when he's due our respect and thanks for the original in spite of it all. You don't have to agree, you don't have to like it, you don't have to see it. Prudence, however, screams to voice your opinion laced with an ounce of respect for Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber's achievements, and I make no bones about being the first to do so.

Andrew, if by chance this post ever makes it before your eyes, I'd like to personally thank you for The Phantom of the Opera. You've moved my soul with your haunting score, touched my heart with a wonderful story, and brought me joy and tears. Beyond all that, you gave me purpose in my life by giving me inspiration to write.

Even if I'm still not totally enthralled with Love Never Dies when I see it for myself, I sincerely thank you and wish you the best out of respect for who you are as a human being and the contributions you have made to the public. After all, a famous author once penned the cry of the Phantom as saying, "All I ever wanted was to be loved for myself." I, as a fan, owe you nothing less than the same. Otherwise, I'm merely a hypocrite, who claims to know the meaning of the story, but fails to live it by giving you the respect that is due.


Penned from my heart,
The Phantom's Student

Selasa, 09 Maret 2010

The ART of the gadget...

So I have the sometimes habitual trait of being a techno junkie...not really a bad thing except that it makes me want to get the newest and hottest item out on the market even when i don't need it.

When the Apple iPad was first announced I thought;

'Wow, what a cool device but I have absolutely no use for it.'

I already have a laptop that serves basically the same function and I
have a cell phone so I really don't need another one that's a "pad"....but then it hit.

Like some sad addiction (soy chai latte) I get the update that the iPad will be released in April and I rush to the Apple website to look at it again. Nothing has changed...it's still the same unit, same images, same pricing, same functions...but boy is it cool.

And...it has accessories...and anything with accessories is a must have in a guys world.











































There is an iPad casethat is transformable (OptimusPrime) and that makes all the difference in the world. I don't want my iPad getting scuffed and I can also use it to prop up my iPad so that I can use it in a reclined position and watch movies in comfort or allow my daughter to watch Baby Singing Time downloads while we travel in the car...there's even an optional external keyboard for my iPad that makes it a versatile for office use, my iPad will...

Waaaait a minute... MY iPad? When did it become my iPad. I told myself that I didn't need one. I convinced myself that the functionality was something I already had covered. There is money better spent elsewhere...but I MUST have one! It has accessories!!! Damn marketing geniuses!!!

Well maybe in time. Priorities are priorities and baby's shoes are freakin' expensive! I think I'm going to invent the expandable, transformable kids shoe.

Holy Mackerel...somebody already did it!!! Expandable Shoes

Yes...but can the play a MOVIE!?!





Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...